Last Updated 5/7/08

Additional Deputies Assigned to Compton Station Following Murder Wave

Hub City Celebrates 120 Years This Weekend

Gang Members Fire at Deputies With High-powered Assault Rifle

Tarbabe Recycling Club Teams With Heal the Bay for Creek Cleanup

Expo Helps Businesses Go ‘Green,’ Reduce Energy Costs

First United Methodist Church Celebrates 140 Years

Compton Clergy Denounce Slanderous Campaign Tactics

The Faces of Foster Care: Improving Outcomes for Children of Color

Activists Stage City Hall Protest After Local Landmark Goes Missing

Joseph Phillips:
God and Percocet

In Medical Marijuana States, a Patient’s Authorized Pot Use Could Block Access to Life-saving Transplants

Classifieds

SEARCH our archives

HOME

East Gardena Neighborhood Wants Sex Offenders Out
Officials say residential care facility is in full compliance with state law

By Allison Jean Eaton
Bulletin Staff Writer

GARDENA – Residents in an East Gardena neighborhood are taking matters into their own hands after the state said it does not plan to take action regarding a group of sex offenders residing in a single-family home there.

Up until last week, six paroled sex offenders were confirmed by the Sheriff’s Department to be living under the same roof at 15517 Sandel Ave. in the unincorporated county area sandwiched between Gardena and Compton.

Four still remain after two were forced to leave early last week when the county enforced an ordinance preventing more than four adults from living in a single-family household, said Renita R. Bowlin of Supervisor Yvonne B. Burke’s office.

Attention at the county level was drawn to the situation after roughly 60 concerned members of the community Saturday, April 26 staged a protest outside the residence demanding it be shut down.

State officials said they consider the location a residential care facility, and therefore it is in full compliance with the law.

California law allows up to six registered sex offenders to live in the same residential care facility unless legally related by blood, marriage or adoption. It allows only one to live in a single-family home. Offenders must not live within 2,000 feet of a school or park.

Neighbors argue that it is not a facility, but a single-family home in a neighborhood full of children and seniors, and they want the sex offenders out.

Many of them gathered at Beulah Land Baptist Church on 154th Street last Tuesday in hopes of obtaining answers from authorities.

Unfortunately for many, they did not receive the answers they were hoping for.

Although their three children are grown, Phyllis and Mallory Funches, who live next door, are both highly concerned. They’ve lived in the neighborhood since 1965.

“We’re a neighborhood, you know, with families all along the street. These people are transients. They’ve got new people moving in every week,” said Phyllis. “We’re close on our street. We all know each other. We talk to each other. They aren’t part of our community, and they are not going to be integrated into our community.”

Sharon Cruse, president of the East Gardena Neighborhood Watch, said no one from the state ever notified the neighborhood that sex offenders were moving in.

“I understand that people need someplace to stay, I know that. But the thing is this, there was no proper notification,” she said.

State officials said that for certain low-level offenders, neighborhood notification is not required.

So Cruse has taken it upon herself to identify the men she sees entering and leaving the home three houses down from hers through the Megan’s Law Website. She then emails their photos to neighbors to keep them informed. She also keeps track of their comings and goings and reports inconsistencies to the parole officer.

Last Wednesday afternoon, she was busy at home printing up color photos of three of the men she’s been able to identify to distribute to neighbors.

In her opinion, the state is dropping the ball and targeting her neighborhood by “dumping” the offenders there.

“This is why we need to take it to the streets,” she said during the meeting. “The state ain’t gonna do a damn thing about this.”

She was also last Wednesday finishing up an angry e-mail to the governor and state officials.

The offenders’ state parole officer and a supervisor showed up early to last Tuesday’s meeting and told Cruse they would not speak to or field questions from residents because a public information officer was not present.

Cruse said that is “totally unacceptable,” especially when her tax dollars are being used to house the men there.

“So I said, ‘Why are you talking to me then? You can’t talk to the community as a whole?’ They wanted to try and explain codes. Well, I don’t want to hear about any codes, I just want to know why are you dumping these people in my community?”

The previous owners had put the home up for sale last year, said Cruse. Someone recently leased it out and turned it into a boarding facility. The offenders began moving in at the end of February and the beginning of March, she said.

The state is currently contracting with the individual leasing the home to house the offenders as they transition back into society. Offenders are monitored and must adhere to curfews and other restrictions as terms of their parole.

But that, say some parents, simply isn’t enough.

“My children are no longer allowed to play outside,” said LaVern White, who has two young daughters and lives directly across the street from the offenders’ residence on Sandel.

She’s especially concerned because one of the offenders is guilty of performing lewd acts with a child under 14, according to the Megan’s Law site.

“I am very disturbed. I’m outraged. I just moved into the area and I’ve been here less than a year. When I moved there, it seemed like a very safe environment. It felt very comfortable because it was a cul-de-sac. And now I have sex offenders living steps away from my door?

“I feel like I don’t have a voice and my kids don’t have a right,” said White. “They’re taking our safety away.”

Asked if she believes the offenders have the right to live somewhere as they try to reintegrate into society, White said not in her neighborhood.

“They don’t have the right to live steps away from my door. They did a crime, and I didn’t, and my kids didn’t, and we should have a right to be safe and feel safe in our community.”

Cruse said she’s worried that with the housing market as it is, as homes are foreclosed upon and go up for sale, anyone can come in, lease or purchase one and contract with the state to house multiple sex offenders.

For now, the neighborhood has banded together and is planning to stage additional protests in front of the home in addition to the home of the individual who has leased the property and is contracting with the state.

Cruse said she doesn’t know what else they can do.

“We’re trying to do it by the book, but the book is trying to slap us down.”

Compton Station Capt. William Ryan said the department’s hands are tied because no laws are being broken. The neighborhood is within the station’s service area.

“On our end of it, we’re doing everything we can,” he said. “Based upon existing law, the registrants in that house are in compliance.”




ADVERTISE | CLASSIFIEDS | ABOUT US | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIBE | HOME

 

 

 

This site and its contents ©2008 thecomptonbulletin.com