Last Updated 6/11/08

Hall Headed to Sacramento

Compton Center Announces New Permanent Provost

City Announces Gang Injunction Finally Moving Forward at Anti-Crime Group Meeting

Wilson Skate Park Project Breaks Ground

Villaraigosa, Magic Johnson Announce 10,000th Job Filled, Urge Participation in HIRE LA’s Youth Program

Vanguard Junior High Alumni Invited to Big Picnic

Joseph Phillips:
Fanfare For The Common Man

Classifieds

SEARCH our archives

HOME

Compton Center Rolls Out Facilities Master Plan
Goals for bringing antiquated campus into the 21st century seen as a long overdue renaissance and necessary to regaining accreditation

By Allison Jean Eaton
Bulletin Staff Writer

COMPTON – As Compton Center trudges through the first stages of regaining accreditation, the school recently introduced to the public a preliminary version of a facilities master plan that aims to fully transform the campus aesthetic.

The plan, presented at last month’s Compton Community College District Board of Trustees meeting, has yet to be finalized but should be within the next several weeks, said Fred Sturner, director of Facilities, Management and Planning at Compton Center.

At the top of the list among its main objectives is a focus on students, said Deborah Shepley, an architect with tBP Architecture, one of the firms hired by the school to assist in formulating the plan.

“It’s the students that need to be here, it’s the students we need more of on campus,” she said.

Goals include better utilizing the quad and streamlining pedestrian pathways; centralizing student and administrative services areas; boosting curb appeal; establishing a health center; improving the cafeteria, bookstore and staff lounge areas; and creating outdoor meeting/gathering areas that will further a relaxed environment.

Divided into four phases, Shepley said the plan would take between 7 – 10 years to complete and will require the demolition and rebuilding of many of the former college’s main buildings, some of which are upwards of 50 years old.

Currently those buildings are grandfathered in to meet today’s seismic and other safety requirements. The catch, said Sturner, is that if any renovation work is done to those buildings, then they will be required by law to meet today’s building code standards.

“Economically speaking, that makes it almost cheaper to tear them down and rebuild,” he said. “We look at that as an opportunity – if something is not so feasible to restore, maybe we can put something new there.”

Compton Center’s campus was originally situated primarily to the north near what used to be its main entrance and exit off Greenleaf Boulevard. It gradually spread south over the years following the construction of the Gardena (91) Freeway, after which time the entrance off Artesia Boulevard became the main ingress and egress.

However, because portions of the campus were built during different decades, facilities on the campus as a whole are mismatched, lack unity and are not clustered together by classification.

“It’s very difficult to get a sense of place, a sense of where you are and where you are going,” said Sturner of the current layout.

Row buildings, which are home to most of the school’s classrooms, were built in the 1950s. Next came the gymnasium in the 1960s, and additional physical education buildings and the Allied Health Center in the 1980s. The Mathematics and Science building was constructed in the 1990s, and the 21st century brought with it the Child Development Center (CDC) and the still empty and unused Learning Resource Center (LRC), which was built improperly and remains unsafe for habitation.

The entrances, said Shepley, are poorly marked. This does not bode well for a school that is in dire need of boosting visibility and increasing enrollment numbers as part of the process of regaining accreditation.

“These entrances mark the campus, but they are not as monumental and as strong a gateway presentation as they could be,” she said. “In fact, when we first came to the campus, we drove right by it and had to turn around and come back.

“In order to increase the identity, it’s really important that those edges really announce what’s happening on the inside of the campus.”

Once parked, the campus is not very welcoming, especially in the south lot.

“It feels like you’re coming in the back door,” she said.

Broken down by phase, Shepley estimated phase one would take roughly three to four years to complete, while each phase after that should take one to two.

“ But it depends a lot on funding and other issues,” she added.

Officials labeled the master plan’s creation and development as a highly participatory process in which students, staff and the community were involved.

“This is something that I think the whole campus is proud of because of the crazy hours, the time and the energy that individuals put into this and the exception with which all of the suggestions were taken into consideration,” said Interim Provost Dr. Doris Givens. “It was done in a way that we can be proud of.”

Givens labeled the plan’s unveiling as a “celebration.”

The architect and consultant worked with a committee comprised of representatives from various campus subcommittees “in order to have representation for all.” Project goals were developed from feedback gathered from the committee and area residents via a community meeting held in December.

After gathering input, the architect came up with three potential plans. From those three, a fourth plan combining elements of each was created, which was eventually chosen as the preferred option.

The district paid tBP and another consultancy firm roughly $300,000 to complete a full assessment as well as develop and finalize the plan. Sturner said doing so was necessary because the school must submit a facilities master plan when applying for grants from the state to fund the plan’s many components.

What Comes Next
The first phase will consist of what Shepley described as the school’s top priorities.

These include the opening of the LRC and the centralization of library and LRC services; renovation of the Little Theatre; construction of a 14,000-square-foot instructional building to replace the easternmost section of row buildings to be demolished during phase one; construction of a centralized student services center; renovation of the administration building; and new overhead and pedestrian lighting on the southern portion of the campus.

Altogether in today’s dollars, Sturner said phase one’s price tag is a hefty $83 million. Of that, the state is currently expected to contribute $54 million.

“Though we are actively working on increasing the state contribution and decreasing our contribution,” the facilities director said.

Reopening the Allied Health Center (AHC) is surprisingly not part of phase one; one would think it would be identified as a “top priority.” However, both Shepley and Sturner said that because the school is in line to receive state funding for that particular project, it has been slated for phase two to allow time for the money to come in.

The AHC, home to Compton Center’s flagship nursing program, has been closed since December 2006 after a serious flood that revealed an underlying mold problem. Because of the pre-existing mold condition, the school was only able to secure $550,000 from the insurance company – far less than what it would take for its repair and reinstatement.

Since the flood, the nursing program has been administered in a portion of the D-row building, which was renovated to meet the vocational program’s needs.

Work and expansion of the AHC will be a roughly $6.5 million undertaking in today’s dollars, and the state is expected to contribute $4.5 million to the cause, Sturner said.

If things go as he anticipates, work on the AHC will “straddle” phase one and phase two, he added.

Relative to the LRC, a multi-story building constructed several years ago and made nearly entirely of glass, that building should soon be habitable.

Sturner said the school is nearing an agreement with the contractor that botched the job when constructing the LRC, which resulted in the building’s not obtaining approval by the Department of the State Architect (DSA). Once that work is corrected and the DSA gives its OK, its doors will finally be open. He estimated this will take between six to 18 months.




ADVERTISE | CLASSIFIEDS | ABOUT US | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIBE | HOME

 

 

 

This site and its contents ©2008 thecomptonbulletin.com